Ultimate Guide to Prepare NCP-MCI-6.10 with Accurate PDF Questions [Oct 24, 2025]
Pass Nutanix With Pass4SureQuiz Exam Dumps
NEW QUESTION # 28
Per organizational requirements, an administrator has uploaded a signed SSL certificate to Prism for Common Access Card (CAC) authentication.
Once the certificate has been uploaded successfully, the certificate appears to be valid but CAC authentication is not functional.
What is a potential cause of this problem?
- A. RSA key size is incorrect.
- B. Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) is not enabled.
- C. Signature Algorithm is incorrect.
- D. There is no Certificate Revocation List (CRL) configured.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 29
Due to application requirements, an administrator needs to modify an AHV VM in order to support a large number of distinct, concurrent connections. The VM has the following configuration:
* VCPUs: 4
* RAM: 20 GB
Operating System: Microsoft Windows Server 2022
Which modification can the administrator make to improve network performance for network I/O-intensive applications running on this VM?
- A. Enabling RSS Virtio-Net Multi-Queue
- B. Enabling AHV Turbo Technology
- C. Adding more RAM
- D. Adding more VCPUs
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 30
An administrator has been tasked with justifyingwhy Nutanix Disaster Recoverywas chosen for amulti-tier application spanning multiple business units.
What is the most efficient way to organize and manage the workloads?
- A. Utilize RESTful APIs to script creation of Recovery Plans
- B. Utilize Categories to organize VMs in Recovery Plans
- C. Utilize a VM naming schema that allows sorting
- D. Utilize a 1:10 ratio of Recovery Plan to VMs
Answer: B
Explanation:
Nutanix Categories allow administrators to group related VMs, making Disaster Recovery (DR) planning easier.
* Option B (Utilize Categories to organize VMs in Recovery Plans) is correct:
* Categories help group VMsbased on application tiers(e.g.,database, middleware, web servers).
* This ensuresorderly failoverwhile maintaining application dependencies.
* Option A (Naming schema) is incorrect:
* Naming conventions help, but theydo not provide functional organizationin recovery plans.
* Option C (1:10 Recovery Plan to VMs) is incorrect:
* The ratio depends onbusiness requirements, not a fixed number.
* Option D (RESTful APIs) is incorrect:
* Automation is useful, butit does not replace proper VM grouping via categories.
References:
* Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide #Using Categories for DR Management
* Nutanix KB #Organizing VMs for Disaster Recovery Planning
NEW QUESTION # 31
An administrator is receiving repeated approval requests to delete a protected snapshot that has already been approved.
What is the likely cause?
- A. There is an error with the SMTP server.
- B. The administrator is an approver on the approval policy.
- C. There are multiple approvers on the approval policy.
- D. The Policy Engine wasn't implemented.
Answer: B
Explanation:
In Nutanix Prism Central, if anadministrator is also an approverfor an approval policy, it can result in repeated prompts for approvals even after the original request is approved. This occurs because the system requires the approver (who is also the requester) to explicitly confirm actions involving protected snapshots to maintain compliance and avoid accidental deletion.
From theNutanix ECA documentation:
"When an administrator is configured as an approver in the approval policy, repeated approval requests may occur because the same user must explicitly confirm actions they initiated, such as deleting protected snapshots. This ensures administrative actions are fully deliberate."
NEW QUESTION # 32
An administrator needs to create asingle chartshowing multiplestorage bandwidth metricsa VM is consuming.
Which type of chart should the administrator create?
- A. Entity Chart
- B. Hypervisor Performance Chart
- C. VM Summary Chart
- D. Metric Chart
Answer: A
Explanation:
Entity Charts in Nutanix Prism Central allow multiple metrics from a single entity (e.g., VM, storage container) to be displayed on a single graph.
* Option B (Entity Chart) is correct:
* This allows the administrator totrack multiple performance metrics(e.g., read/write bandwidth, IOPS) for aspecific VM.
* Option A (Metric Chart) is incorrect:
* Metric Charts track a single metric across multiple entities, which does not meet the requirement ofdisplaying multiple metrics for a single VM.
* Option C (Hypervisor Performance Chart) is incorrect:
* Hypervisor Performance Chartstrack host-level metrics, notVM-specific bandwidth metrics.
* Option D (VM Summary Chart) is incorrect:
* VM Summary Chartsonly provide an overviewand do not supportcustom multi-metric tracking
.
References:
* Nutanix Prism Central Guide#Entity vs. Metric Charts for Performance Analysis
* Nutanix KB#Creating Custom Charts in Prism Central
NEW QUESTION # 33
An administrator has successfully configuredMetro Availabilityfor aProtection Domain. However, after a few days, anNCC warningis raised:
"Following VMs are accessing data from remote clusters: VM-1 from remote cluster Remote-ML" What is the first action an administrator must take to fix the issue?
- A. Usemust-affinity rulesto avoid automated VM migration to the standby datastore.
- B. Run the command:
ncli pd list metro-avail=true | egrep "Protection Domain Stretch Role" | grep "ACTIVE" - C. Run the command:
ncc health_checks metro_availability_checks data_locality_check --cvm_list=X.X.X.20 - D. Migrate the VM to itsprimary siteand set appropriate rules forDRS and affinity.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Metro Availability requires that VMs always read data from their primary site to maintain optimal performance and prevent remote data access latency.
* Option C (Migrate the VM to its primary site and set appropriate rules) is correct:
* If a VMfails over to the secondary sitebut is still running in the primary site, it will read data remotely, causinghigh latency and performance issues.
* The solution is tomigrate the VM back to the primary siteand configureDRS rulesorhost affinity settingsto prevent unwanted movement.
* Option A is incorrect:
* The command listsactive Metro Availability protection domainsbut doesnot resolvethe issue.
* Option B is incorrect:
* Must-affinity rules can help, but they should be configuredafter migrating the VM back to the primary site.
* Option D is incorrect:
* RunningNCC health checkswill onlydiagnose the issue, not resolve it.
References:
* Nutanix Bible #Metro Availability and Data Locality
* Nutanix Best Practices #VM Affinity Rules for Metro Availability
* Nutanix KB #Troubleshooting Remote Data Access in Metro Availability
NEW QUESTION # 34
An administrator needs tocreate a storage containerforVM disks. The container must meet the following conditions:
* 10 GiB of the total allocated space must not be used by other containers.
* The container must have a maximum storage capacity of 500 GiB.
What settings should the administrator configure while creating the storage container?
- A. Set Advertised Capacity to 10 GiB.
- B. Set Reserved Capacity to 500 GiB.
- C. Set Advertised Capacity to 10 GiB and Reserved Capacity to 500 GiB.
- D. Set Reserved Capacity to 10 GiB and Advertised Capacity to 500 GiB.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Nutanix storage containers allow administrators to configure capacity reservations and advertised limits for better resource management.
* Option D (Set Reserved Capacity to 10 GiB and Advertised Capacity to 500 GiB) is correct:
* Reserved Capacityensures that10 GiB is always available for this container and not consumed by other containers.
* Advertised Capacitydefines alogical limit of 500 GiBto prevent over-allocation.
* Option A is incorrect:
* Advertised Capacity of 10 GiB is too lowand does not match the requirement of a500 GiB storage container.
* Option B is incorrect:
* Only setting Advertised Capacity does not guarantee Reserved Capacity, meaning other containers could consume the reserved space.
* Option C is incorrect:
* Setting only Reserved Capacity does not enforce an upper limit, which could lead to overprovisioning.
References:
* Nutanix Storage Management Guide#Understanding Storage Container Settings
* Nutanix KB#Advertised vs. Reserved Capacity in Storage Containers
NEW QUESTION # 35
An administrator is managing an environment based on two different AHV-based and ESXi-based clusters.
Workloads are evenly distributed and in a healthy state.
A Linux VM running on ESXi is not performing well at the storage level and is configured as follows:
* VCPU: 8
* VRAM: 32
* vDisk: 3, first 100 GB, second 250 GB, third 250 GB
What is the easiest way to test VM performance, while minimizing downtime?
- A. Migrate the VM to the AHV cluster.
- B. Collapse the second and the third disk into a single one
- C. Enable vDisk sharding at AOS level.
- D. Increase the number of vCPUs.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The best way to test the performance of a Linux VM that is underperforming at the storage level on an ESXi cluster, while minimizing downtime, is to migrate the VM to an AHV-based cluster. This allows leveraging Nutanix-native storage optimizations and hypervisor capabilities of AHV.
From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:
"AHV and Nutanix storage integration is natively optimized for performance, leveraging capabilities like data locality, I/O path enhancements, and advanced metadata management. Migrating workloads from ESXi to AHV can often resolve performance bottlenecks associated with storage I/O." Additionally:
"Using the Nutanix Move tool, administrators can migrate running VMs between different hypervisors (e.g., ESXi to AHV) with minimal downtime and fully automated steps, reducing the operational burden." Increasing vCPUs would not address storage-level performance issues, and collapsing disks would require significant reconfiguration and VM downtime. vDisk sharding is not directly user-configurable and not applicable in this scenario.
NEW QUESTION # 36
An administrator has been tasked with developing a Prism Central Recovery Plan for 50 workloads that will be assigned new IP addresses and will need to utilize a new DNS server upon instantiation of workloads in the Disaster Recovery (DR) location.
What is the best way to accomplish this?
- A. Enable scripting within Recovery Sequence & utilize custom script per VM.
- B. Install Nutanix Guest Tools, this will allow Re-IP and automatically assign updated DNS server(s).
- C. Update DNS settings on production VMs prior to execution of Recovery Plan.
- D. Utilize recovery Plan to bring VMs online at DR and then manually login to each VM and update IP
/DNS.
Answer: A
Explanation:
For workloads requiring new IP addresses and DNS server settings during DR recovery, using custom scripting within the Recovery Plan is the recommended and supported method.
From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:
"Recovery Plans support scripting within the Recovery Sequence to enable administrators to perform post- recovery customization tasks, such as updating IP addresses, configuring DNS, or applying application- specific settings."
"This scripting capability provides a flexible, automated approach to ensure that VMs are correctly reconfigured to operate within the DR environment's network and DNS settings." This avoids the need for manual reconfiguration post-recovery or adjusting settings in production prior to failover.
NEW QUESTION # 37
An administrator needs to enableWindows Defender Credential Guardto comply with company policy.
The new VM configurations include:
* Legacy BIOS
* 4 vCPUs
* 8 GB RAM
* Windows Server 2019
What must be changed in order to properly enable Windows Defender Credential Guard?
- A. Update Memory to 16GB.
- B. Update vCPU to 8.
- C. Use Windows Server 2022.
- D. Enable UEFI with Secure Boot.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Windows Defender Credential Guard requires UEFI firmware and Secure Boot to function properly.
* Option B (Enable UEFI with Secure Boot) is correct:
* Credential Guardrequires a UEFI-based boot moderather thanLegacy BIOS.
* Secure Boot ensures only trusted OS components load, reducing attack surface for credential theft.
* Option A (Update vCPU to 8) is incorrect:
* Increasing vCPUs does not impactCredential Guard compatibility.
* Option C (Use Windows Server 2022) is incorrect:
* Windows Server 2019supports Credential Guard; upgrading to 2022 isnot required.
* Option D (Update Memory to 16GB) is incorrect:
* Credential Guard has no minimum RAM requirementbeyond general OS needs.
References:
* Microsoft Docs#Requirements for Windows Defender Credential Guard
* Nutanix AHV VM Management Guide#Enabling Secure Boot & UEFI for WindowsVMs
NEW QUESTION # 38
ADisaster Recovery administratorhas set up aProtection Policy for 50 workloads, all configured similarly.
TheRPO is 60 minuteswith aspecified retention of 10 local copies, 5 remote copies, and crash consistency.
After activation,recovery points are not appearing at the DR site, even though they arevisible on the production side.
What is the most likely issue?
- A. The storage container RF factor does not match in both clusters.
- B. Windows updates need to be applied to all affected VMs.
- C. The storage container name on the DR cluster does not match the production cluster.
- D. Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) is not installed on the source VMs.
Answer: C
Explanation:
For Disaster Recovery to function correctly, the source and destination storage containersmust have identical names.
* Option C (Storage container name mismatch) is correct:
* If thestorage container name at the DR site does not match, Nutanix cannot mapsnapshots and replication data.
* This causesfailover operations to fail, even though data exists.
* Option A (NGT not installed) is incorrect:
* NGT is needed for application-consistent snapshots, butnot required for crash-consistent snapshots.
* Option B (Windows updates) is incorrect:
* OS updates do not affect replication availability.
* Option D (Storage RF factor mismatch) is incorrect:
* Replication works across different RF factors, but performance may vary.
References:
* Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide#Requirements for Remote Replication
* Nutanix KB#Storage Container Mapping for Protection Domains
NEW QUESTION # 39
Which storage attributes do Storage Policies manage?
- A. Shares and Object Stores
- B. Data Protection and Security
- C. Replication Factor and Encryption
- D. Storage Containers and Volume Groups
Answer: C
Explanation:
Storage Policies in Nutanix allow administrators to configuredata protection and performance settingsat the storage container level.
* Replication Factor (RF)definesthe number of copies of datastored across nodes for fault tolerance.
* Encryptionensures thatdata at rest is protectedvia Nutanix-native encryption methods.
* Option A (Storage Containers and Volume Groups)refers tostorage organization, not policies.
* Option C (Shares and Object Stores)applies tofile and object storage services, not VM storage policies.
* Option D (Data Protection and Security)is a broad term but does not definespecific policy attributes.
References:
* Nutanix Prism Element #Storage Policies and Replication Factor (RF)
* Nutanix Bible #Storage Fabric and Data Resiliency
* Nutanix KB #Enabling Encryption in Storage Policies
NEW QUESTION # 40
An administrator needs to configureNTPonPrism Central running on a Hyper-V cluster.
How should the administrator complete this task?
- A. Add theIP of the Domain Controller.
- B. Add aserver with a DNS hostname.
- C. Add anexternal NTP server.
- D. Add theDNS server IP.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Nutanix requires thatall cluster components synchronize time using an external NTP (Network Time Protocol) server.
* Option A (Adding an external NTP server) is correctbecause Nutanix best practices recommend using anexternal time source to prevent clock drift between cluster nodes.
* Option B (DNS server IP) is incorrect: ADNS server does not provide NTP services.
* Option C (Server with DNS hostname) is incorrectunless the DNS hostnameresolves to an NTP server.
* Option D (IP of the Domain Controller) is incorrectbecausenot all domain controllers provide NTP servicesunless explicitly configured.
References:
* Nutanix Best Practices:NTP Configuration for Hyper-V Clusters
* Nutanix KB:Ensuring Proper Time Synchronization Across Cluster Nodes
* Nutanix Documentation:Prism Central NTP Settings Configuration
NEW QUESTION # 41
An administrator is responsible forresource planningand needs to plan forresiliencyof a10-node RF3 cluster
. The cluster has100TB of storage.
How should the administrator plan for capacity in the event of future failures?
- A. Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to Auto Detect.
- B. Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to None.
- C. Set Reserve Memory Capacity (%) to 20.
- D. Set Reserve Storage Capacity (%) to 20.
Answer: A
Explanation:
RF3 (Replication Factor 3) clusters require sufficient reserved capacity to tolerate failures without data loss.
* Option C (Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to Auto Detect) is correct:
* Auto Detect dynamically calculates the necessary reserved spacebased on cluster size and RF settings.
* It ensures thatenough storage remains available in case of a node failure.
* Option A (Set Reserve Storage Capacity to 20%) is incorrect:
* The required storage reservationdepends on the number of nodes and RF level, not a fixed percentage.
* Option B (Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to None) is incorrect:
* Without reserved capacity,a node failure could lead to data unavailability.
* Option D (Set Reserve Memory Capacity to 20%) is incorrect:
* This setting applies toRAM, notstorage resiliency.
References:
* Nutanix Bible #Understanding Replication Factor (RF) and Failure Planning
* Nutanix Prism Element Guide #Configuring Reserve Capacity for Cluster Resiliency
* Nutanix KB #How to Plan Capacity for RF3 Clusters
NEW QUESTION # 42
What would cause an LCM pre-check event with the test_esx_entering_mm_pinned_vms check during an AOS upgrade?
- A. HA priority settings are misconfigured.
- B. VMs on the host have high CPU usage.
- C. Host has insufficient memory.
- D. Affinity rules are configured to prevent VM migration.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The test_esx_entering_mm_pinned_vms check in an AOS upgrade validates whether there are any pinned VMs on ESXi hosts, which could prevent host maintenance mode transitions.
From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:
"Affinity or anti-affinity rules that pin VMs to specific hosts prevent those VMs from migrating during host maintenance mode entry. This directly triggers a failure in the LCM precheck test_esx_entering_mm_pinned_vms check."
NEW QUESTION # 43
......
Latest NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam Dumps - Valid and Updated Dumps: https://actualanswers.pass4surequiz.com/NCP-MCI-6.10-exam-quiz.html